Workflows
A workflow without a checking step ships its worst output
Any process that produces plausible results at volume will eventually produce a plausible wrong one, and…
· 3 min read
Chaining steps together so the result is repeatable rather than lucky.
20 articles · page 1 of 2
Workflows
A single prompt that extracts, judges and writes gives you no way to tell which of those three went wrong, and the fix is to make each one produce something you can look at.
By Bhavna Deshpande · · 4 min read
Workflows
Any process that produces plausible results at volume will eventually produce a plausible wrong one, and…
· 3 min read
Workflows
Supplying more material does not straightforwardly mean more of it gets used, and building around that…
· 4 min read
Workflows
Instructions that live in chat history are irrecoverable in practice, and treating them as artefacts with a…
· 3 min read
Workflows
Automation decisions here turn less on how well the tool performs a task than on whether a wrong result…
· 4 min read
Workflows
Breaking work into steps is the standard advice and it has a real failure mode, because some tasks depend…
· 3 min read
Workflows
The difference between an instruction you rewrite every time and one with named blanks is that only the…
· 3 min read
Workflows
A small deliberate pilot answers the questions that decide whether a batch job is worth running at all, and…
· 3 min read
Workflows
Automated steps keep producing output after the conditions they were built for have changed, and the…
· 3 min read
Workflows
A process that is pleasant at one item and unusable at a thousand usually failed on arithmetic rather than…
· 3 min read
Workflows
Extraction is among the most reliable things these tools do, provided the process treats a missing value as…
· 3 min read
Workflows
Checking at volume fails through attention rather than through ignorance, so the review has to be designed…
· 3 min read